Ad Sence

Saleh

Custom Search

Friday, July 24, 2009

The Art of Presidential Branding

George W. Bush? John Kerry? Why do these 'brands' invoke high emotions and spark great debate even amongst the closest of friends and family? The battle for hearts and minds during this campaign season exemplifies the sheer power of brand identity! General Motors, Proctor & Gamble, and a host of other Fortune 100 organizations would pay untold millions to garner such passion and loyalty toward their individual brands.
This article is not a political commentary on campaign tactics, but more of a glimpse of the branding model each opponent employs. A content analysis of recent speeches and web-portal statements will serve as the base-line and metric from which a summation can be drawn. The outcome from this exercise will be to uncover the artistry these parties are attempting to create in the public's minds-eye!
Brand Essentials:The essentials of branding (www.ibranz.com/article.html) will provide a framework from which this discussion will ensue. These principles include:
What is your overall brand perception today?
Describe the future brand goal
Create a plan to reach that goal
John Kerry:
Brand Perception Today? John Kerry's key identifier today is 'Putting Families First' as noted on his official website www.johnkerry.com. He defines the problem as low paying jobs, high energy and health care costs, and the need for consumer protection to safeguard middle-income Americans. The challenge facing Kerry's value proposition is - can government programs create higher paying jobs, alter OPEC and HMO costs, or affect free market economies? In addition, a brand perception is multi-faceted and takes years to develop, communicate, and digest. His historic stance on a myriad of issues (including the Vietnam hearings and his voting record on key issues) can not be crafted in the short-term after decades of message layering. One immutable law of branding holds true - you can only own ONE position in the consumer's mind!
Future Brand Goal? As with any political platform, a distinct agenda sets apart each candidate and provides a compelling message. Kerry's message states:'Kerry and Edwards have a plan to create millions of high-quality, good-paying jobs in America. They will end tax breaks for companies that shift jobs overseas and instead give tax breaks for companies that create jobs here in America. They will also enforce our trade agreements to make sure American companies and workers are competing on a level playing field in the world.'The underlying message asserts if you punish companies who outsource abroad and increase trade barriers, the net result will be higher paying jobs in America. If Dell Corporation were to move their technical call center from India to Pittsburg, would Dell really pay significantly higher wages? Also, Dell would become less competitive by increasing their operating costs, thus pushing these expenses onto the general public. By reducing the ability of US companies to be competitive in the marketplace and increasing barriers to free trade, the US will more likely become more isolated in the global economy.
Create a Plan: Kerry's plan includes the following specifics:
Cut health-care premiums by $1000
Lower energy prices
Cut tuition
Affordable housing
The implementation plan of each item as noted in the mass media is general in nature and non-specific. For example, the solution proposed for lower energy prices (gasoline) includes investing in new energy sources and technologies. The development of solar, geothermal, wind and other alternatives to fossil-fuels has taken decades to realize and generate significant impact. Even if the scientific or private community were to create a revolutionary breakthrough during his administration, it would take another decade to usefully employ it!
The Kerry Brand Unveiled
The brand model deployed by Kerry is rooted in campaign promises which suggest a better life for Americans.
Brand Promise: The key Brand Promise is 'Families First' and the ancillary messages (energy, health-care, jobs, etc.) help to support that central ideology.
Brand-Value Proposition: The proposition Kerry employs is one of the 'Advocate for the people' and 'Government solutions' to all ailments.
Brand Solution: The democratic forum, one of greater government funding and control, will care for the populous.
George W. Bush:
Brand perception today? After four years in the White House, the public has had ample time to evaluate the actions, speeches, and agenda of the standing President. On his website (georgebush.com), his key identifier is 'A plan for a safer world & more hopeful America.' His agenda includes creating opportunity for American Workers, helping families in a changing world, promoting an era of ownership, defending lives and liberty, and supporting community/honoring American values. The challenge facing Bush's value proposition is - can government effect such changes as promoting new business development and making health care available to every poor county in America? Although he led our nation through unthinkable tragedy, the occupation in Iraq and WMD's have certainly taken their toll on the candidate's overall perception. As unfair as it may be, elections are more about perceptions than reality.
Future Brand Goal? According to a recent USA Today article, the Bush go-forward plan was articulated in this fashion:
'Bush promised last week that he would outline new domestic proposals. McClellan said they'll include the next steps in improving education, reducing health care costs and fostering an economy that promotes an "ownership society." He'll say changes in the governments of Iraq and Afghanistan are steps toward democratic reforms throughout that region.'
The key message here speaks to bolstering the domestic infrastructure through programs and incentives. On the international front, spreading the democratic agenda throughout the world will stabilize regions that were once under dictatorial or radical fundamentalist regimes. The essential difference between Kerry and Bush lies in the approach and methodology employed. Kerry's logic suggests government will drive change, whereas Bush implies government will facilitate and motivate the community to enhance their livelihood. The only question becomes - help yourself or let someone else do the work for you?
Create a Plan: Bush's plan includes the following specifics:
Reforming schools
Tax reform - simplify the process
Opportunity zones to spur new business
Expanding health care savings plans
Affordable housing
Fight terrorism
Faith-based and community initiatives
As previously discussed, the above-mentioned initiatives are facilitated by government, but rely on Americans to make them a reality. This plan then asserts Americans are receptive to ownership and involvement (i.e. hard work) to turn ideas into actionable plans. Although Bush has created the opportunity, his administration will be evaluated on how well Americans respond to his vision for the future.The Bush Brand Unveiled
The brand model deployed by Bush invites Americans to take the lead for change and places government in the role of facilitator.
Brand Promise: Bush's Brand Promise was encapsulated in a September 7th speech in Missouri when he announced he aimed 'to build a safer world, and a more hopeful America.'
Brand-Value Proposition: The proposition Bush employs is one of 'government as facilitator' and 'calls for the American involvement' to effect change.
Brand Solution: The Republican forum, one of less government control and creating opportunity, is the rallying cry.
Summary:
Whether you are a Democrat or Republican, the brand you select this November will alter your life for better or worse. As with any brand decision, such as the car you drive or clothes you wear, this brand choice has far reaching implications. As a consumer of information, the real challenge is to get past the 'campaign rhetoric' and be an informed buyer. During a recent business trip to Zurich, I asked a local what he thought of President Bush. After he rattled off many scathing comments, I asked him for specifics which supported his beliefs. There were none, just conjecture. Unfortunately, many consumers take opinions at face value, only to pay for their choice down the road.
Branding is a valuable tool we use in every facet of our lives. This 'short-cut' helps us quickly make a myriad of decisions that would otherwise require an insurmountable amount of time to investigate on our own. In addition, opinion leaders help guide us on areas of unfamiliarity. The balance we face each day is how to make the best brand choice with limited information.
As with any brand decision, the advice/opinions of family and friends are valuable to consider; including divergent views. Go one step further! Invest a little time and research the key issues each side has outlined on their website so you can decide for yourself. Remember, this brand decision will affect your life for the next four years - make sure you are an informed and wise consumer!

No comments: